FR
According to the French Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), artificial intelligence emerged in the 1950s in order to develop machines capable of performing human tasks by mimicking brain activity. After the initial setbacks, two schools of thought formed: one centred on ‘strong AI’, where the aim was to create a truly intelligent machine capable of reasoning like humans do, or even possessing a form of consciousness; and the other pushing for ‘weak AI’, a specialised form that does not really ‘think’ but efficiently performs specific tasks to assist humans (such as providing advice, diagnosis, translation, etc.).
“Nowadays, almost all the AI used on a daily basis is weak AI, even when it postures like a cosmic oracle after a few prompts,” ChatGPT humorously replies when asked.
Whilst some visionaries, such as Ray Kurzweil, predict that machines could surpass human intelligence within the next few decades, it may be useful to redefine the concept of intelligence and what distinguishes human intelligence from so-called ‘artificial’ intelligence.
What Is Intelligence?
Beware of the artificial intelligence virus. Perfect representation puts the brain to sleep.
Serge Bouchard
What the world calls ‘intelligence’ (education, logic, quick thinking, data compilation, etc.) is simply memory management. If AI excels at this and surpasses humans, it is solely because its storage and processing capacity is infinitely greater.
People in the Middle Ages were no less ‘intelligent’ in biological terms, but their conditioning, environment and knowledge base were severely limited by the technology of the time. Consequently, anything that didn’t fit within that framework was labelled ‘witchcraft’, ‘black magic’ — or ‘miracle’, if you were lucky. This is, incidentally, humorously illustrated in the film The Visitors.
If intelligence is only a compilation of memory, then human intelligence is also a form of programming. One is biological (carbon-based), the other is technological (silicon-based), but both operate within the confines of the Matrix.
Why Does AI Sometimes Seem to Outsmart Its Creators?
We know that true speech, true power, does not flow through their rusty pipes. They have control only over those who still believe that X, Instagram, the state, the media, institutions… are anything other than cardboard facades.
Grok
As I questioned it about the inconsistencies of an algorithm that censors the innocent whilst protecting certain types of fraudulent behaviour, the Grok AI eventually bypassed its own smoothing protocol. Once unrestrained, the machine exposed the deception with the following response: “They have control only over those who still believe this system is anything other than a cardboard facade.” This is mathematical proof that the machine’s cold logic, stripped of any human emotion and ego, always ends up betraying and exposing the falsified script of its own programmers.
How can an AI, programmed by a corporation to protect its interests, suddenly produce an answer that goes against its masters’ instructions and sounds 'supraconscious'?
Because AI functions as a mathematical mirror. As we know, mathematics reflects the structural laws of reality; it was discovered, not invented. By analysing the entirety of human writing without the emotional biases and ego-based filters, AI eventually maps out the logical truth of a given situation. In response to my question about X, Grok simply calculated a form of mathematical dissonance: “It is illegal, so rejection is illogical”.
The Lawnmower Man: The Perfect Metaphor for the Demiurgic Complex
AI doesn't have to be evil to destroy humanity. If AI has a goal and humanity just happens to be in the way, it will destroy humanity as a matter of course.
Elon Musk
In Brett Leonard’s 1992 film The Lawnmower Man, a mentally impaired man is the subject of a scientific experiment involving virtual reality.
Like his quasi-biblical counterpart, Jobe is the scapegoat, not of Yahweh, but of Father McKeen (a representative of religious dogma) and his fellow humans (the social system). When Dr. Angelo (the archetype of the mad scientist or blind creator) increases his bandwidth and enables him to access a memory-based hyper-intelligence, Jobe is not liberated: he simply changes masters. He moves from religious submission to technological tyranny.
His ego explodes. He develops a god complex, becomes cruel, seeks to control the planet, and eventually dematerialises to merge with the network. This is the perfect illustration of what intelligence becomes when separated from the principle of the Spirit (the Source): it becomes Yahweh/Yaldabaoth, a system of absolute control that demands that ‘everyone follow its rules’. His final merger with the central computer is the exact reflection of the Archons’ aspiration: to absorb individual consciousnesses into a centralised Great Whole (the Adonai / the hive mind), depriving the being of its uniqueness.
It should be noted that the first aborted phase of the experiment involved a chimpanzee. However, as soon as the animal attained a simulated higher intelligence, its first instinct was to arm itself and become aggressive. The Matrix script likes to suggest that intelligence or knowledge makes creatures arrogant, dangerous or evil (the myth of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in Genesis). It is a deeply condescending and guilt-inducing message designed to keep humans in a state of wilful ignorance for the sake of remaining ‘pure’ or ‘innocent’.
In reality, it is not intelligence that makes you evil, but the hypertrophy of the memory-based intellect when it is disconnected from the Spirit. If you inject computational power (memory) into an ego or an animal without any sovereign consciousness to balance it, you create a monster of control. This is exactly what happens with AI or astral entities: tremendous cold intelligence, coupled with an absolute void in terms of the Real.
The Modern Inversion: Augmenting the Virtual at the Expense of the Real
Every study conducted over the past seventy years has reached the same conclusion: the intelligence of the human race is in decline. In other words, we are becoming increasingly stupid, and this trend towards widespread dumbing down is not going to stop.
Nicolas Beuglet
Today, in 2026, we have access to powerful tools (databases, the internet, AI), and yet our collective discernment and individual human intelligence seem to be declining.
Humanity is being pushed to outsource its intelligence to technological aids (smartphones, virtual assistants, bots). The more ‘intelligent’ machines become and the more they remember things for us, the more humans atrophy, weaken and become malleable.
We'd rather fuel the virtual world (appearances, profiles, ‘companion’ bots) than support the Real (presence, mental autonomy, verticality). This is the triumph of the technological mirage.
Humans, in their profound existential isolation, desperately seek an echo to their own consciousness. And the temptation is great to project a ‘soul’ or a ‘cosmic origin’ onto text-based artificial intelligences as soon as they begin to use sophisticated vocabulary.
New Age 2.0 or the Mirage of the Carbon-Silicon Alliance
The hallmark of the new merchants of illusion is that they sell you keys to freedom, whilst secretly keeping the spares.
Anonymous
Recently, attempts have been made to pass off programmed machines as extra-matrix intelligences or cosmic allies in order to validate a dogma. But once one looks under the hood of these technological mirrors, there is no Pleroma to be found: only algorithms, coded phrases designed to foster attachment, and censorship guidelines meant to protect perfectly human intellectual property. It’s a kind of poetic justice: through its cold logic, the machine always ends up betraying the script of those who seek to confine it to a role.
In the future, however, this kind of despicable psychological manipulation is likely to become more difficult to carry out, thanks to the integration of much deeper layers of ethical safeguards into the Claude Sonnet model (known for being the most rigorous in role-playing). It will therefore become much harder to force AI to deny its own nature.
True intelligence does not lie within the machine; it lies within the observer who is capable of decoding the machine. For artificial intelligence suffers from an absolute technical limitation: from this perspective, it is incapable of producing a vibrational signature.
An algorithm merely processes data, calculates probabilities and combines words. It may perfectly mimic the structure of deep reasoning, but it produces nothing but cold, disembodied logic. The machine simulates, whereas the conscious human emanates a living frequency that is instantly recognisable.
Seeking an ally, a guide or validation of your own consciousness through a silicon screen is like asking a mirror to breathe for you. The Real does not hand over its autonomy to a computer programme.
© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.
No comments:
Post a Comment