Once Upon a Broken Heart

In 2025, a Page Odyssey, I introduced you to the Caraval three-book series released in 2017 by American author Stephanie Garber. Now I'd like to review a follow-up trilogy by the same author, which I found equally enjoyable. Published in 2021, Once Upon a Broken Heart is set in the same fantasy world but focuses on the fate of a new protagonist, a hopeless romantic whose discernment is inversely proportional to her exaggerated saviour complex — something that smacks more of compulsive recklessness than conscious heroism, and seems to make her a magnet for every psychopath on earth. Among them is the very ‘borderline’ Jacks, also known as the Prince of Hearts, previously featured in the last two volumes of Caraval, who becomes the captivating central figure of the series.

When Fairy Tales Go Sour

While the previous story ended on a note of triumph and resolution, this one begins on a decidedly darker, more ambiguous note. Stephanie Garber explains that she actually wanted to tell a fairy tale with murder added to it: “I thought it would be fun to have a girl solve a murder while falling for someone she suspected might actually be responsible for the murder,” she says

Evangeline Fox is a bit like Cinderella: an orphan, bullied by a greedy stepmother, and secretly envied by her stepsister. Almost caricaturally naive, she maintains an unquestioning belief in the existence of soulmates, twin flames, and other persistent, deceptive myths such as Everlasting Love. Hence her devastation when, overnight, she finds out that despite being deeply in love with her, her sweetheart is about to marry her stepsister. 

Evangeline had a gift when it came to believing in things that others considered myths—like the immortal Fates. She opened the metal grate. The door itself didn’t have a handle, forcing her to wedge her fingers into the tiny space between its jagged edge and the dirty stone wall. The door pinched her fingers, drawing a drop of blood, and she swore she heard its splintered voice say, Do you know what you’re about to step into? Nothing but heartbreak will come from this. But Evangeline’s heart was already broken. And she understood the risks she was taking. She knew the rules for visiting Fated churches.

In desperation, she bargains with the charismatic Prince of Hearts to stop the wedding. But as the saying goes, “Be careful what you wish for”. As soon as her wish is granted, she immediately regrets it. Fortunately, nothing is ever set in stone forever — not even her. Except that nothing ever comes for free either, and her second chance granted for a fresh start quickly turns out to be a bittersweet, poisoned gift. 

Just like the deadly kiss of Jacks the Cursed, whose heart has stopped beating, as revealed in Caraval. Even though the broken heart in the title officially refers to Evangeline's, it seems that Jacks' has suffered even greater damage — enough to turn him into a Fate — although the author remains unclear about the circumstances.

Stephanie Garber, 2021 - Flatiron Books - 1232 pages

How Far Would You Go for Happily Ever After?

This opening question alone on the back cover captures the main theme of the series and brings up several others: What is happiness? What is eternity? And most importantly, why would anyone want to confine the very essence of life — which is supposed to be an ever-changing flow — to a fixed, permanent state?

Jacks became immortal, though it is unclear how, in the wake of a romantic tragedy caused by a curse cast upon him. His heart has stopped beating, but he still has the power to affect the hearts of mortals. The curse that turned him into a Fate is not only emotional, it is ontological. It is worth noting that, from an occult perspective, the heart is the symbol of the inner core of the soul

It is a frequently recurring symbol in fairy tales. One example is Snow White, whose heart the hunter, sent by the Evil Queen, is tasked with retrieving. The heart is part of the mechanism of entrapment. It is a vessel for memories and vital energy.

In this series, immortality is vampiric. It requires blood. There's even a blood-sucking tree: “Anyone clever enough to find the tree and brave enough to drink its blood will be human no more, but immortal”. This comes at the cost of sacrificing the person you love most. However, the end appears to justify the means. Even in fairy tales.

And given all the backstabbing, curses and other failed (or successful) murder attempts, the quest for immortality is anything but glorious and actually drives people mad. It entraps them in never-ending cycles and patterns in which the original wound is replayed over and over again. Even when memory is altered or fragmented, something always remains. Lifelines seem to keep repeating. Forgetting does not eliminate the wound: it simply obscures it.

Jacks Out of the Box

If the heart is regarded as a carrier of memories and vital energy, Jacks stands as a quintessential anomaly. He no longer possesses his own — at least not in the same way as everyone — and yet he exerts influence over other people's hearts. He does not merely convey a desire or an illusion: he reactivates wounds, expectations, and hidden legacies.

Jacks is undoubtedly one of Stephanie Garber's most compelling characters. He is somewhat akin, albeit darker and more complex, to Archibald in Christelle Dabos' The Mirror Visitor series.

What makes him so intriguing is that his apparent cruelty is not gratuitous, unlike what his behaviour in Caraval seemed to suggest. It stems from a more ancient mechanism. He is not only ambiguous, he is the product of a system that transforms wounds into functions. The archetype of the tempter linked to the forbidden fruit — the iconic red-juiced white apples, which he eats in all circumstances.

He is not just a tragic seducer. He is the fulcrum of a memory that transcends individuals. His apparent nonchalance is more of an armour than a sign of indifference. When you are doomed to outlive those you love, attachment becomes a liability. For an immortal, to love a mortal is to accept that you will lose every time. 

Jacks does not play with hearts out of cruelty. He shields himself from a world where every promise has an expiry date. While trying to avoid getting hurt, he ends up hurting others. And that is undoubtedly the real curse: the one that dooms him to kill any woman he kisses if she is not his true love.

“Every Story Has the Potential for Infinite Endings”

This raises an important question: do the characters in this series really choose their actions, or are they simply replaying predetermined storylines?

Amidst curses, prophecies and spells of secrecy – which prevent them from telling the truth – speech itself seems to be under control.

The Valors, the first royal family of the Magnificent North, had constructed the arch as a passageway to a place called the Valory. No one knew what the Valory contained, since the stories of the North couldn’t be fully trusted, thanks to the story curse that had been placed on them. Some tales couldn’t be written down without bursting into flames, others couldn’t leave the North, and many changed every time they were told, becoming less reliable with every retelling. In the case of the Valory, there were two conflicting accounts. 

The tales of the North catch fire, become distorted and inconsistent, and ultimately shape reality. History is no longer a reliable reference point: it is instrumentalised.

Whereas Caraval celebrated the illusion as spectacle, Once Upon a Broken Heart offers a glimpse into what goes on behind the scenes.

The warm, theatrical atmosphere of Valora in the South gives way to the colder and harsher setting of the Far North. The arches hold more than just wonder: they open the way to power struggles, coveted magical artefacts, negotiated alliances, and rumours spreading faster than the actual truth.

The media shape reputations, fabricate scapegoats, and pass judgment based on hearsay. Magic turns to strategy.

In this deceptively enchanting world, full of contradictory tales, alternate timelines, amnesia, artefacts, and mythical creatures, where certain truths cannot be spoken, Evangeline finally stops blindly believing the stories she is told. She learns to discern, to observe, to connect the dots rather than surrender to them.

Following on from Caraval, which presented illusion as entertainment, this series explores the reverse side of storytelling: its capacity to manipulate as well as expose. Stories may deceive, conceal, and influence perceptions — but they may also be a source of empowerment. It all depends on who is telling them, and who chooses to believe them.

Beyond the balls, curses and oaths of eternal love, the series questions the power of the narratives that shape our perceptions. Admittedly, it remains a romantasy aimed at a young adult audience, where gloom is tempered by enchantment. But beneath the glittering veneer lies a more troubling question: do the stories we tell ourselves construct our reality, or do they merely distort it?

© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Easter: The Shock of the Real

Easter is a celebration tied to paedophilia, where we do not consume the body of ‘Christ’, but rather that of a vampiric entity that penetrates the individual.

Jesus represents each individual’s planetary memory. 

At Christmas, this memory takes the form of a child, embodying the Soul’s innocence and naivety. 

It is then sacrificed at Easter, symbolically marking its death (return to the astral plane), before re-entering the cycle of reincarnation to continue energy exploitation. 

This is a condensed version of a fact well known among higher occult lodges.

Original text by ISO V. SINCLAIR translated from French by EY@EL
© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Am I the Matrix?

The matrix is not a place. It is not an external conspiracy. It is not a system imposed by some alien force.

The matrix is where consciousness abdicates. It begins the day we surrender our inner sovereignty for comfort, security, identity, or the promise of meaningfulness.

It sets in when we choose to react rather than see. When we mistake dreams for life. When we hand over our responsibility to a framework, a narrative, an authority.

But its most subtle lock lies elsewhere. The matrix seals itself when we believe that thoughts are our own. When we no longer see that thought is a stream, a programme, a conditioned response to an environment, and not an origin.

As long as thought is mistaken for identity, freedom remains pure theory. For one cannot leave a prison if they believe themselves to be its gatekeeper.

The matrix does not need walls. It runs on compliance. On silent consent. On habit. It does not compel: it makes us believe.

And the day consciousness ceases to identify with what it thinks, what it feels, what it believes itself to be... the matrix does not collapse. It simply ceases to be.

For what held the system together was neither power, nor fear, nor structure. It was forgetfulness.

Original text by ÉLÉHA translated from French by EY@EL
© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Love Without Structure Is a Losing Strategy

Machiavelli once said:

If you cannot be both loved and feared, choose to be feared.

What did he really mean?

We live in a world that glorifies unconditional love, boundless forgiveness and self-sacrifice. We are told that the ideal man is one who gives everything, endures in silence and loves even when it tears him apart.

However, Niccolò Machiavelli, one of history’s most brilliant higher-level strategists, viewed things differently.

Unbridled emotion is not a virtue. It is a vulnerability. And he was right.

Opening your heart without restraint, expending your energy without discernment, and putting up with what drains you — that is not love; it is emotional suicide.

Vibrational Supraconsciousness teaches that we must learn to guard our heart. Not to turn ourselves into robots or become insensitive, of course, but to protect and strengthen it. For a person lacking self-assurance becomes easy prey to emotional abuse, even from those who claim to love them.

Love without structure becomes self-destruction. The more you give unconditionally, the less you are appreciated. Being constantly available makes you invisible.

Your patience, your compassion and your generosity turn into background noise. Not because people are evil, but because the nature of this simulation takes for granted what comes without effort. What is given freely is squandered. What is earned is respected.

That is why Supraconsciousness does not tell you to stop loving; rather, it tells you to:

Love strategically — with Intelligence.
Love within clear boundaries.
Love without losing yourself.

Many people today live in ‘peace’ because they have sacrificed their own voice. But this is not peace; it is emotional numbness. And this numbness robs you of your dignity, your energy, and your leadership.

Being ‘cold’ doesn’t mean you feel nothing. It means you don’t give your energy to those who demand more than they deserve. It means you are selective about who you give your time to — and who you don’t, without guilt.

It means setting boundaries so clearly that they cannot be crossed without consequences, even if someone calls you cold-hearted. And if someone tells you, “You’ve changed”, just nod. What they’re really missing isn’t your love; it’s your naivety that allowed them to use you.

You're not here to be approved. You're here to be respected. You're not here to beg for affection masquerading as dependence, but to rebuild your inner empire, and that isn't achieved by pleasing others.

As Machiavelli wrote:

A fox spots traps.

So, be cunning foxes!

Original text by ISO V. SINCLAIR translated from French by EY@EL
© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Sovereignty vs Dissolution

There is a school of thought that wants you to believe that ‘true spirituality’ means breaking down all your barriers, giving up your defences, and dissolving into a borderless ‘unity’.

This is the most sophisticated trap of vibrational predation there is. You are told that 'protecting yourself' is a sign of fear. 

In Reality, a boundary is a property line. Your body and your vibrational space are your sovereign territory.

An electrician does not touch bare wires out of ‘love for unity’ — he wears gloves because he respects the laws of electricity. Sovereignty is the insulation of your circuits so that your voltage does not leak into the mass.

The idea that ‘All is One’ and that there's no self to centre is an invitation to energy squatting. When you stop centring yourself, you become a vacant zone.

By denying your ‘persona’ (your physical and mental structure), you leave the door open to any external programming. Unity without discernment is not love. It's porosity.

True mastery does not consist in disappearing into another, but in remaining identified with your own Spirit in the midst of chaos.

You have the right — and the duty — to choose who you let into your space, what you eat, and which frequencies you allow in your home. A sovereign ‘no’ is the purest act of respect for your own existence.

Do not mistake peace for passivity. True Light is cold and incisive. Stay grounded, stay centred, and keep your protections activated.

Unity is not found in merging with the outside, but in the total coherence of your own structure.

Original text by ÉLÉHA translated from French by EY@EL
© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

The Dark Days Club

As mentioned in 2025, a Page Odyssey, the issue with book series is often that the plot runs out of steam and gets bogged down, usually falling flat like a soufflé in the grand finale. Stephen King's Dark Tower seven-book series is a very good example of this phenomenon, whereas J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter saga is a perfect counterexample. In the former, the author goes with the flow without really knowing where he's headed. In the latter, her imagination is channelled into a roadmap that is sufficiently detailed to prevent her inspiration from straying too far from the main narrative arc, at the risk of losing readers along the way. 

Originally published ten years ago, the Lady Helen trilogy is the exception that proves the rule, falling into the second category of narrative consistency and masterful development from beginning to end. It is a huge favourite of mine that I wanted to share right away.

Jane Austen-Style Romance and Dark Fantasy

To set the scene, its author, Australian Alison Goodman, views it as a cross between Pride and Prejudice and Buffy the Vampire Slayer. A book of manners tinged with dark fantasy.

On her website, she explains how, before she started to write the first of the Lady Helen series, she spent eight months reading books and watching documentaries about the English Regency (1811-1820), which was a time of excess for the aristocracy, but also a period of uncertainty caused by the Napoleonic Wars, the French Revolution and the Reign of Terror at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution and the social unrest that came with it.

More specifically, for Book 1 — The Dark Days Club — she studied Regency London and what was called “the Season”, which went from about January to June while Parliament sat. She says, “It was the busiest and most important social season when young ladies made their debut to polite society and entered the marriage mart.

The second book — The Dark Days Pact — took her research to the seaside resort of Brighton and the summer social season, and Book 3 — The Dark Days Deceit — is all about the spa resort of Bath and the winter social season.  

Alison Goodman, 2016 - Harper Collins - 1515 pages

So Lady Helen Wrexhall is a young English aristocrat about to be introduced to Queen Charlotte's court — a crucial moment for her social and marital future. She lives under the guardianship of her very uptight uncle — some sort of Regency-era Vernon Dursley — and her kind aunt who treats her like her own daughter. Orphaned since a shipwreck that claimed her parents' lives, she also has to deal with a reputation tarnished by scandalous rumours of her mother's treason.

Lord Pennworth’s views on women, and unholiness in general, were often expressed, both at home and in public. He was an admirer of the evangelical Hannah More, although unlike that moderate lady, his own particular brand of piety was made of choler and spit. His vehement campaigning against the bawdy houses had captured the attention of the caricaturists, who had rechristened him Lord Stopcock in their savage cartoons. On one of her midnight forays into his papers, Helen had found a published engraving of him by Cruikshank. She had been forced to stuff her fist in her mouth to stop from laughing at the uncanny depiction of him as a cockerel: huge barrel chest thrust out, round eyes bulging, and florid face colored in the bloated red of the coxcomb drawn atop his head.

Deceivers vs Reclaimers

Even before her presentation, the disappearance of a maid leads her to a hidden reality: London is home to demons infiltrating all strata of society.

Enter the handsome, brooding Lord Carlston, who has returned from exile after being suspected of murdering his wife. He belongs to the Dark Days Club, a secret organisation appointed by the home office to maintain balance in the face of vicious (and numerous) demons known as Deceivers.

These creatures, much like vampires (and Archons), feed on the vital energy of humans and their emotions — fear, violence, chaos, lust. They live inconspicuously among them, produce offspring destined to serve as their hosts when the bodies they occupy become compromised, and even attend high society events. Some within the Club itself whisper that Bonaparte could be one of them. As long as their existence remains unknown, they maintain the status quo. So the supernatural world does not stand apart from the real world: it coexists with it, invisible to most.

Deceivers are not mere predators driven by instinct. They operate within a framework, a pact, a form of negotiated balance that regulates their violence without ever eradicating it. They can survive, thrive, and circumvent their demise — always at the expense of others. The chilling thing is not only their predatory nature, but the sophistication of the system that makes it possible: an organisation where the survival of some methodically depends on the gradual eradication of others. Their threat goes beyond the individual. It infiltrates lineages, moves from body to body, leaves traces that cannot be erased without damage.

They are not just monsters. They are masters of persistence. The struggle is not between pure Good and a caricature of Evil, but between two forces compelled to act in a world where every decision creates casualties.

Lady Helen discovers that she herself is, by nature, a member of this club — a direct heiress. She possesses a special energy and gifts that make her a Reclaimer and force her to choose: to remain in a rigidly codified existence of privilege and carefree living, or to step into a more stimulating but infinitely more dangerous world, where madness is as real a risk as death.

How Lady Helen Holds the Reader Spellbound

What makes this series a page-turner that you can't put down isn't just its fantasy element. The perfectly recreated historical setting alone provides a solid foundation that makes the characters strikingly real — so perfectly portrayed that the personality of the ultimate antagonist was enough for me to recognise him as such, even though his identity is only revealed at the very end. It's as if words could produce a vibration and make fictional characters 'real'. This gives us food for thought about the nature of this simulation, doesn't it?

But let's get back to the characters created by Alison Goodman.

Lady Helen's gradual evolution from a naive upper-class young woman to a Deceiver-slayer and soul-Reclaimer is very well crafted because, from the outset, behind her apparent submission to the oppressive social constraints imposed on women of her time, she never passively accepts her fate, educates herself in secret on subjects considered ‘unladylike’ and fights against this new identity that destiny has imposed on her. Her journey is as much internal as it is physical: it is one of emancipation in a society that drastically limits women.

Her mentor, Lord Carlston, embodies the figure of the maverick hero, bearer of forbidden and morally ambiguous knowledge that disturbs conventional thinking. He is shrouded in an aura of mystery, so much so that it is impossible to know where he stands, as the line between good and evil is blurred. Think of him as a kind of Sirius Black who never went to Azkaban.

Lord Carlston was handsome, Helen conceded, in a hard, angular way that made the men around him seem somewhat effeminate. Yet there was a ruthlessness to the set of his mouth that was decidedly repellent. His skin was unfashionably tanned—both Andrew and Aunt Leonore had mentioned he had been on the Continent—and the brown of his eyes was so dark that it merged with the black pupil, making their expression impenetrable. It was very disconcerting and gave him a flat look of soullessness, like the eyes of the preserved shark she had seen in the new Egyptian Hall. Helen lifted her bare shoulders against a sudden chill. How apt. There could be no soul in this man: he was a murderer. And possibly an abductor. She wrapped her fingers more firmly around the head of the fan and the miniature. Just in time, for her aunt was turning to introduce the men.

Not to mention a gallery of colourful secondary characters, full of light and shade, with qualities and flaws that make them all the more human.  

A number of the minor characters are my interpretations of real historical figures”, explains Alison Goodman. “The Prince Regent, of course, as well as Queen Charlotte and Princesses Mary and Augusta, Beau Brummell, Lady Jersey, Lord Byron, Lady Caroline Lamb, Lord Perceval, and John Bellingham. The events around Lord Perceval and Bellingham are also true—Bellingham did assassinate the Prime Minister—and my depiction is entirely based on newspaper and magazine reports from the time, as is my description of the terrible Ratcliffe Highway murders.

Even the “villains” in the story always have a good reason for being so. It is these subtle nuances that, in my humble opinion, make it so endearing, to the point that a certain nostalgia sets in once the very last page has been turned.

While the members of the Dark Days Club have returned to their immortal resting place on our library shelf, the Deceivers are still very much among us. It is up to us to exercise the vigilance of a Reclaimer's gaze and our neutrality so as not to provide them with any more precious loosh.

© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Nothing Is Fated. Everything Is Programmed.

Most of us spend our lives trying to fix what is wrong, convinced that, in order to feel better, all we need is to understand, analyse or 'heal'. Unaware that, in doing so, we are merely redecorating our cell. For it is not external events that truly imprison us, but rather what allows them to occur over and over again in different forms. What keeps repeating is not a coincidence: it is a pattern — a programmed structure.

Identifying Programming Loops

A pattern is not an isolated emotion or a personal story. It is a line of encoded memory embedded in our psyche — sometimes even in our soul — attracting the same scenarios, the same interpersonal dynamics, the same dead ends. The faces change, so do the backdrops, but the final sensation remains strangely the same. Rejection, humiliation, fear, insecurity. The system feeds on this recurring emotional charge. For the matrix, recycled emotional pain is a resource.

The matrix does not begin on the outside. It originates from the very place where we are no longer aware that we are reacting. Some emotions appear within before our conscious mind can even process them. Not because they are ‘us,’ but because they have been learned, repeated, and passed on. They are collective memories. Ingrained patterns. Reflexes.

A programme is easy to recognise when we know where to look. A programmed memory always reacts before we do. It is always triggered by the same things. It keeps coming back, even when we've mentally figured it out. It  makes us believe that “it's normal” or "that's life". When something gets activated without us consciously choosing it, it is not an inner truth at all. It's an automated response. What occurs repeatedly and absent-mindedly is not experience. It's an instruction.

So the real question is not why, but whether this really feels like us.

Dissolving Coded Memories

We cannot dissolve a memory by fighting it, nor by 'working' on it. Exertion, struggle, and emotional involvement are precisely what keeps it going. The key is not confrontation but withdrawal.

When a script is being reactivated, the first thing to do is to cut short any internal narrative. Stop recounting the story. Stop justifying. Simply give a name to what is happening: “Such-and-such a programme has just been activated.” Such dispassionate identification creates an instant distance.

Next comes non-reaction. The repetitive pattern seeks a hook, a vibration, an emotional charge. If we remain neutral, present, unaffected, it runs out of steam. Without anger, without sustained sadness, without inner drama, the current no longer flows. This is not indifference, it is lucidity.

Then comes the refusal to consent. At some point, we must clearly state that we have seen through the magic trick. That we are no longer willing to be part of this cycle. Not by force, but by a clear internal decision.

Of course, the memory may re-surface. It may even grow stronger to begin with. However, it is not a failure. It is a test. The matrix is simply checking whether we're going to identify with it again or remain centred. When we hold our position, something changes subtly but profoundly: the memory is still there, but it no longer has any power. 

One day, we find ourself smiling where before we would have tensed up. Afterwards, we are confronted with the same issues again — the same types of people, the same triggers. But inside, the ground is no longer the same. No more fight or flight. No more justifying. Just quiet presence.

The memory eventually dies out on its own because it is no longer fed. There was nothing to heal. Nothing to fix. Just to disengage. And what we lose is not ourselves... it is what was feeding off us.

Lucid beings are not seeking happiness in the simulation. They are just trying to free themselves from the workings of their programming by detaching themselves from what does not belong to them in order to fully belong to themselves.

Original text by ELÉHAtranslated from French by EY@EL
© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Note to the Reader

The Call of the Real
The Real is not reached by adding meaning, but by letting the dream die. If you've been following my work, you might have noticed a gradual decrease ...

Featured Post

Once Upon a Broken Heart

In 2025, a Page Odyssey , I introduced you to the Caraval  three-book series released in 2017 by American author Stephanie Garber. Now ...

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *