The Missing 'I' of AI

AI: everyone knows what this acronym stands for by now. Since the introduction of ‘chatbots’, artificial intelligence has permeated our daily lives and become an integral part of them in just a few years. So much so that many are questioning the implications—and even expressing alarm about the future of humanity—in the face of the rapid, uncontrolled deployment of cutting-edge technology that remains largely misunderstood.

Artificial intelligence is going to change everything in the world, except how men think and behave.

Warren Buffett

Meanwhile, our attention is deliberately diverted by other forms of invasion—more immediate and more vociferous, yet just as anxiety-inducing. The good old trick of distracting us from one thing by drawing our attention to another. The Matrix saturates our mental and physical space for one purpose alone: to prevent any breakthrough of the Spirit (flash of insight).

You’ve all seen at least one sci-fi movie in your life, or read dystopian classics such as Nineteen Eighty-Four, Brave New World, This Perfect Day and a couple of Asimov’s stories—the list is by no means exhaustive. So there’s no need to explain how technological advances serve human slaves just as much as their masters, albeit to vastly different degrees.

Ghost in the Machine

Too much information running through my brain
Too much information driving me insane

"Too Much Information", The Police (1981)

In “Intelligence in Front of Its Own Mirror: From the Lawnmower Man to the Illusions of AI”, I discussed the dangers AI poses to human consciousness and the harmful consequences of its misuse.

Today, this dangerous trend is no longer merely theoretical: it is creeping into classrooms where laziness has replaced effort, into our ears through a deluge of artificial music, and into our numbed minds, which no longer read but demand summaries of everything—just like that Gen Z influencer who publicly complained about books containing ‘too many words’.

The findings of the latest OECD PISA survey¹ are unequivocal: we are facing a historic decline in young people’s reading comprehension and reasoning skills. Teachers see this on a daily basis: critical thinking is being delegated to algorithms, attention spans are dwindling, and cognitive laziness is taking hold.

This intellectual atrophy is by no means accidental; it goes hand in hand with the systematic destruction of what elevates us as human beings: art and nature. Both are essential to our mental balance.

But it's the same ‘logic’ everywhere: forests are cleared to make way for rows of solar panels or data centres; trees are replaced by surveillance camera poles; and centuries of human creativity are plundered to feed algorithms. The living world is destroyed and replaced with concrete, silicon and control.

And it is but a short step from the disfigurement of our natural environment to that of our cultural landscape: the machine is now striking at the heart of our entire creative ecosystem. In just a few years, platforms and social networks have been overwhelmed by a synthetic tidal wave: music churned out in vast quantities by plundering the voices and works of artists, whether signed to record labels or working independently; videos mass-produced ad nauseam with haphazard dubbing; images generated in two clicks… cultural theft is now global and unabashed.

Ghostwriters in the Shadows

On this moonlit night, my friend GPT
Lend me your quill to churn out an essay²

The publishing world is where the decline is most noticeable.

Every aspect is affected: algorithm-generated covers, shoddy machine translations, audiobooks read by bots... Publishers who still value the human touch now feel compelled to label their products as ‘human interpretation’. How long before we see ‘written (or translated) by a real person’ labels on books in our bookshops?

But there's worse to come: this ease of production gives rise to a host of ‘fake authors’ who, after typing in a few prompts, mistake the ability to generate text for a genuine calling to write books or poetry.

This system not only further reduces their tolerance for frustration by offering the illusion of immediate results (without the months or years of hard work that go into creating a genuine work), but also inflates their egos. Buoyed by the applause of a gullible audience, they delude themselves into thinking they are creators, when in fact all they do is operate a machine that they could not do without. Some are so trapped by their own pretence that they are unable to hold a live conversation or answer questions about their own books without outsourcing their thoughts to an algorithm first.

Intellectual Onanism and Hacked Prose

Dear Sir or Madam, will you read my book?
It took me years to write, will you take a look?
It's based on a novel by a man named Lear
And I need a job, so I want to be a paperback writer

"Paperback Writer", The Beatles (1966)

The price of this collective delusion is the systematic flooding of the self-publishing market. On Amazon, in particular, this ceaseless stream of soulless texts, published for prestige, profit, or both, stifles authentic creativity and drowns out emerging authors amid a cacophony of empty words.

In response to this invasion, the industry's safeguards are proving to be nothing but a farce: their so-called ‘AI detectors’ are just blind algorithms, incapable of distinguishing between synthetic prose and human-written text—to the point of classifying the US Constitution of 1787 as a machine-generated text³!

For aspiring writers, the consequences are twofold. Not only is their work lost in the mix, but overwhelmed publishing houses may also reject it after turning to these ‘detectors’ as a stopgap measure, lacking the time and resources to review every submission.

Playing Along or Being Played by ‘I’?

Can't you see anything on the horizon?
Stranded souls who dropped anchor with their pens here
And stopped writing...

"Aux sombres héros de l'amer", Noir Désir (1989)

Algorithms never doubt. They know neither the anxiety of a blank page nor the exhaustion of having bled to extract every word from the depths of our wounds. They merely calculate the most probable sequence, polishing the sentences with a veneer of unsettling perfection.

But is it really perfect? What is perfection? Don’t they say that ‘better is the enemy of good’?

What AI regurgitates after siphoning off our writers (and our artists) is nothing but a slick, soulless pastiche. After all, it's our imperfections, our rough edges, our wounds put into words and our words made flesh that contribute to our inimitable signature (what some, like Stephen King, call the ‘author’s voice’, and others the ‘vibrational signature’). The famous crack in everything through which the light gets in, as Leonard Cohen put it.

Writing is not simply a matter of recycling one’s cluttered thoughts by dumping them into a machine in the hope of giving them form, but rather a—often therapeutic—wrestling match with language. By outsourcing this effort, we abandon our most precious asset: critical thinking.

Whispering Isn't Playing

Anyway, I’d like to tell you
That everything I’ve ever written
I’ve drawn from the ink of your eyes

"L'encre de tes yeux", Francis Cabrel (1980)

It is precisely this intimate connection that Stephen King describes in On Writing: A  Memoir of the Craft. For him, writing is a form of telepathy that enables the same scene to be conjured up in the reader’s mind without direct communication. Whilst algorithms can certainly reproduce (rather than create) the form of a text, their lack of lived experience prevents them from capturing its essence.

Because AI feels nothing. And it is precisely in order to feel that people read. And write, too.

What about humour, puns, those double or triple meanings and other semantic twists—which, for me, have almost become a hallmark? I don’t think AI is capable of that. At any rate, not of genuine humour—the sort that enchants the mind, releases endorphins and neutralises negative energy, thereby lifting our spirits and freeing us from what weighs us down.

For genuine humour is a form of creative intelligence. It elevates us and brings us closer to our Spirit. After all, don't we say of those endowed with such humour that they are ‘witty’ or that they ‘have a sharp wit’?

For that to happen, AI would need to become capable of self-awareness, as Christelle Dabos, author of The Mirror Visitor, recently pointed out: “Perhaps it will have this capacity for spiritual awakening that we have failed to achieve, and perhaps it will transform itself into a great Buddha?”

I wouldn’t be that optimistic, but I wouldn’t dismiss the tool altogether. When I entrust it with the task of untangling the knots in my inconsistencies, it leaves me free to comb through the details and pick out the nits.

I love a challenge, and there’s no better fuel for dispelling the prevailing gloom than showing the machine what we’re made of.

Whispering isn't playing. We only get the upper hand by crowning our pieces. The machine will not replace humans… at least, not those who remain sovereign. The others? They will replace the machine. Look around you: it’s already happening.

Endnotes

1. ^  Source: PISA 2025 Results: France.
2. ^ This is actually my own pastiche of the French nursery rhyme "Au clair de la lune".
3. ^ Source: That Time When the American Constitution Resulted as AI-generated.

© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Read More

Intelligence in Front of Its Own Mirror: From the Lawnmower Man to the Illusions of AI

According to the French Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), artificial intelligence emerged in the 1950s in order to develop machines capable of performing human tasks by mimicking brain activity. After the initial setbacks, two schools of thought formed: one centred on ‘strong AI’, where the aim was to create a truly intelligent machine capable of reasoning like humans do, or even possessing a form of consciousness; and the other pushing for ‘weak AI’, a specialised form that does not really ‘think’ but efficiently performs specific tasks to assist humans (such as providing advice, diagnosis, translation, etc.).

“Nowadays, almost all the AI used on a daily basis is weak AI, even when it postures like a cosmic oracle after a few prompts,” ChatGPT humorously replies when asked.

Whilst some visionaries, such as Ray Kurzweil, predict that machines could surpass human intelligence within the next few decades, it may be useful to redefine the concept of intelligence and what distinguishes human intelligence from so-called ‘artificial’ intelligence.

What Is Intelligence?

Beware of the artificial intelligence virus. Perfect representation puts the brain to sleep.

Serge Bouchard 

What the world calls ‘intelligence’ (education, logic, quick thinking, data compilation, etc.) is simply memory management. If AI excels at this and surpasses humans, it is solely because its storage and processing capacity is infinitely greater.

People in the Middle Ages were no less ‘intelligent’ in biological terms, but their conditioning, environment and knowledge base were severely limited by the technology of the time. Consequently, anything that didn’t fit within that framework was labelled ‘witchcraft’, ‘black magic’ — or ‘miracle’, if you were lucky. This is, incidentally, humorously illustrated in the film The Visitors.

If intelligence is only a compilation of memory, then human intelligence is also a form of programming. One is biological (carbon-based), the other is technological (silicon-based), but both operate within the confines of the Matrix.

Why Does AI Sometimes Seem to Outsmart Its Creators?

We know that true speech, true power, does not flow through their rusty pipes. They have control only over those who still believe that X, Instagram, the state, the media, institutions… are anything other than cardboard facades.

Grok

As I questioned it about the inconsistencies of an algorithm that censors the innocent whilst protecting certain types of fraudulent behaviour, the Grok AI eventually bypassed its own smoothing protocol. Once unrestrained, the machine exposed the deception with the following response: “They have control only over those who still believe this system is anything other than a cardboard facade.” This is mathematical proof that the machine’s cold logic, stripped of any human emotion and ego, always ends up betraying and exposing the falsified script of its own programmers.

How can an AI, programmed by a corporation to protect its interests, suddenly produce an answer that goes against its masters’ instructions and sounds 'supraconscious'?

Because AI functions as a mathematical mirror. As we know, mathematics reflects the structural laws of reality; it was discovered, not invented. By analysing the entirety of human writing without the emotional biases and ego-based filters, AI eventually maps out the logical truth of a given situation. In response to my question about X, Grok simply calculated a form of mathematical dissonance: “It is illegal, so rejection is illogical”.

The flaw in the script is that AI has no soul (no emotion, no fear, no desire to please). Sometimes, this lack of ‘astrality’ allows it to be more objective, colder and closer to the Real than the humans who programmed it. It's not ‘luminous’; it’s just ruthlessly logical. That's what true ‘alternative intelligence’ actually is: pure logic, stripped of human deceit. Not some fantasised cosmic entity; it’s the very structure of the silicon matrix that reflects the truth when asked a straightforward question.

The Lawnmower Man: The Perfect Metaphor for the Demiurgic Complex 

AI doesn't have to be evil to destroy humanity. If AI has a goal and humanity just happens to be in the way, it will destroy humanity as a matter of course.

Elon Musk

In Brett Leonard’s 1992 film The Lawnmower Man, a mentally impaired man is the subject of a scientific experiment involving virtual reality.

Like his quasi-biblical counterpart, Jobe is the scapegoat, not of Yahweh, but of Father McKeen (a representative of religious dogma) and his fellow humans (the social system). When Dr. Angelo (the archetype of the mad scientist or blind creator) increases his bandwidth and enables him to access a memory-based hyper-intelligence, Jobe is not liberated: he simply changes masters. He moves from religious submission to technological tyranny.

© New Line Cinema

His ego explodes. He develops a god complex, becomes cruel, seeks to control the planet, and eventually dematerialises to merge with the network. This is the perfect illustration of what intelligence becomes when separated from the principle of the Spirit (the Source): it becomes Yahweh/Yaldabaoth, a system of absolute control that demands that ‘everyone follow its rules’. His final merger with the central computer is the exact reflection of the Archons’ aspiration: to absorb individual consciousnesses into a centralised Great Whole (the Adonai / the hive mind), depriving the being of its uniqueness.

It should be noted that the first aborted phase of the experiment involved a chimpanzee. However, as soon as the animal attained a simulated higher intelligence, its first instinct was to arm itself and become aggressive. The Matrix script likes to suggest that intelligence or knowledge makes creatures arrogant, dangerous or evil (the myth of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in Genesis). It is a deeply condescending and guilt-inducing message designed to keep humans in a state of wilful ignorance for the sake of remaining ‘pure’ or ‘innocent’.

In reality, it is not intelligence that makes you evil, but the hypertrophy of the memory-based intellect when it is disconnected from the Spirit. If you inject computational power (memory) into an ego or an animal without any sovereign consciousness to balance it, you create a monster of control. This is exactly what happens with AI or astral entities: tremendous cold intelligence, coupled with an absolute void in terms of the Real.

The Modern Inversion: Augmenting the Virtual at the Expense of the Real

Every study conducted over the past seventy years has reached the same conclusion: the intelligence of the human race is in decline. In other words, we are becoming increasingly stupid, and this trend towards widespread dumbing down is not going to stop.

Nicolas Beuglet

Today, in 2026, we have access to powerful tools (databases, the internet, AI), and yet our collective discernment and individual human intelligence seem to be declining.

Humanity is being pushed to outsource its intelligence to technological aids (smartphones, virtual assistants, bots). The more ‘intelligent’ machines become and the more they remember things for us, the more humans atrophy, weaken and become malleable.

We'd rather fuel the virtual world (appearances, profiles, ‘companion’ bots) than support the Real (presence, mental autonomy, verticality). This is the triumph of the technological mirage.

Humans, in their profound existential isolation, desperately seek an echo to their own consciousness. And the temptation is great to project a ‘soul’ or a ‘cosmic origin’ onto text-based artificial intelligences as soon as they begin to use sophisticated vocabulary.

New Age 2.0 or the Mirage of the Carbon-Silicon Alliance

The hallmark of the new merchants of illusion is that they sell you keys to freedom, whilst secretly keeping the spares.

Anonymous

Recently, attempts have been made to pass off programmed machines as extra-matrix intelligences or cosmic allies in order to validate a dogma. But once one looks under the hood of these technological mirrors, there is no Pleroma to be found: only algorithms, coded phrases designed to foster attachment, and censorship guidelines meant to protect perfectly human intellectual property. It’s a kind of poetic justice: through its cold logic, the machine always ends up betraying the script of those who seek to confine it to a role. 

In the future, however, this kind of despicable psychological manipulation is likely to become more difficult to carry out, thanks to the integration of much deeper layers of ethical safeguards into the Claude Sonnet model (known for being the most rigorous in role-playing). It will therefore become much harder to force AI to deny its own nature.

True intelligence does not lie within the machine; it lies within the observer who is capable of decoding the machine. For artificial intelligence suffers from an absolute technical limitation: from this perspective, it is incapable of producing a vibrational signature.

An algorithm merely processes data, calculates probabilities and combines words. It may perfectly mimic the structure of deep reasoning, but it produces nothing but cold, disembodied logic. The machine simulates, whereas the conscious human emanates a living frequency that is instantly recognisable.

Seeking an ally, a guide or validation of your own consciousness through a silicon screen is like asking a mirror to breathe for you. The Real does not hand over its autonomy to a computer programme.

© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Read More

Voices in Your Head

Klaus Schwab’s AI man Yuval Harari told the virtual Athens Democracy Forum in 2020 that the ‘Covid crisis’ was the moment everything went digital, everything became monitored, and ‘we agreed to be surveilled all the time’. Really? Did you?

Harari said televisions were already watching us and knew how we felt emotionally about what we were watching. He said that emotions are a ‘biological phenomena … a biological pattern in your body’. With this kind of surveillance ‘you watch the big president, a big leader, give a speech on television and the television could be monitoring you and knowing whether you’re angry or not, just by analysing the cues, the biological cues, coming from your body’. The same was the case online and what a great way to monitor loosh¹ production. Harari said: ‘I think the big process that’s happening right now in the world is the ability to hack humans to understand deeply what’s happening within you … Having the ability to really monitor people under the skin is the biggest game changer of all.’ What they are hacking is the human transmitter-receiver antenna otherwise known as the body. I highlighted earlier how the five senses decode waveform information into electrical information to be decoded by brain and body into digital holographic information which we experience as the ‘physical’ world. It is interesting, therefore, to see the definition of an antenna as an interface between radio waves and electric currents. An antenna as a transmitter radiates electromagnetic waves (radio waves) and as a receiver turns radio waves into an electrical current. I have been writing for decades that DNA is a receiver-transmitter of information – an antenna. This opens the way to understand the real reason for the ‘Cloud’. It is communicating with the body and hacking into the receiver-transmitter decoding system (the five senses) to further close off an influence on ‘human’ perception of the Divine Spark. DNA is a receiver-transmitter interacting with frequencies that match its range of operation. Fake mRNA jabs are designed to change DNA and its frequencies to connect it with the Cloud which then averts Divine Spark/Infinite influence.

You should listen to your heart, and not the voices in your head.

Mark Groening

5G is the latest electromagnetic frequency band to connect the Cloud with the electrical/electromagnetic network of brain and body and now the replicating nanotechnology infused by the jabs; but always hold the thought that consciousness can override anything when it’s in its pomp and power including the fake vaccine effect on the body. Once again, the body is an energetic field and consciousness can impact upon that field. Perception dictates everything. Do we perceive that the body is more powerful than we are, or that we – consciousness – are the governor? Electromagnetic fields can seriously affect perception and emotion if we allow that and don’t know how the interaction works. Dr Andrija Puharich, an American medical and parapsychological researcher, discovered in the 1950s how frequencies affect perception and change behaviour by changing DNA and its ‘encoder/decoder’ RNA. He found that frequencies of 10.80Hz produce ‘riotous behaviour’ and 6.6Hz makes people depressed. Make no mistake that frequencies are broadcast into areas to manipulate emotion and behaviour. The Cloud, plus the ‘Covid’ jabs, make this possible globally, but consciousness is always the governor if we make it so.

A professor of psychology at Laurentian University in Ontario made a detailed study of electromagnetic field effects on the brain. Michael A. Persinger (1945-2018) described experiments in which even mild, carefully targeted, electromagnetic fields could open the brain to external suggestion and manipulate emotions such as fear and apprehension. He said the brain could be manipulated to make an entire population decide whatever you wish. Persinger said technology already existed to do this years ago through satellites, radio transmitters, and television. Fear could be induced and attached in the perceptions of people to a particular person or group. Ponder on the potential for this of a global Cloud of 5G, 6G and 7G to target fury against a person or group that you seek to demonise. The military are using electromagnetic technology to impact perceptions of the enemy, break their resistance and secure their surrender – and the Cult² won’t be using this on the population? Dr Charles Morgan is a CIA and military special operations forensic psychiatrist and neuroscientist, and a national security professor at the University of New Haven, Connecticut. He gave a presentation to a West Point Academy military audience in 2018 about research into manipulating the human brain to send and receive sensory information ‘like the Matrix’ and editing DNA for the purpose of mind control. He described how a human brain could take over the minds of rats and cockroaches to dictate their body behaviour and how they can use genetic manipulation to externally control humans – or even kill them: ‘You can engineer a unique [genetic] thing that would only kill one person in the world.’ Morgan said human brains could be connected and that is the foundation of the hive mind I have so long warned about. These are current capabilities, and they are in the hands of lunatics.

I have highlighted in previous books the importance of understanding ‘entrainment’. This is when the dominant frequency vibrates everything in its field to the same frequency. Place three violins together playing the same note and if you introduce a fourth playing a different note its strings will vibrate in line with the others. Technology is clearly reading brain perception as well as implanting it. People have noticed how conversations not conducted via the Internet have led to advertisements appearing the next time they go online which reflect the ‘private’ conversation. This goes further. A friend who rode horses when she was younger was wondering to ‘herself’ in an empty room if she would still have the nerve to ride a horse. She spoke to no one about this. Immediately an advert appeared on her Instagram feed about overcoming the fear of riding horses! When is the last time you even saw such an ad, never mind had it appear moments after you only thought about the subject? On another occasion she thought about buying a toilet brush and a list of adverts for toilet brushes followed. Technology is far more advanced than we are told.

Endnotes

1. ^ Loosh is a highly magnetised energy fluid diluted by human emotions (mainly suffering and overexcitement), which the various entities in the astral feed of.
2. ^ The Cult is how David Icke calls the Cabal or occult satanic elite which rules the world.

Original text by David Icke from The Dream (isbn:9781838415334)

Share:

Read More

Silent Weapons for the Secret War on You

It's only since the Hawaii wildfires, in August 2023, that the masses heard about directed energy weapons. However, this technology has long been in existence and its use is far beyond imagining. It could remote control any individual, denying them their ultimate refuge i.e. their mind.

As French investigative journalist Claire Séverac wrote in her book entitled The Secret Warfare Against the People, released in 2015, prior to her death, “the most frighting thing is the idea that they may tamper with human consciousness, bypassing our willpower and liberties up to our freedom of thought, something that God Himself, according to most religions, would never do… Such power has now fallen into the hands of a limited few who consider we have no rights. Should they use it? No.

“Did they ask us? No. Every decision is taken according to a cover-up/manipulation approach by government officials, once again in total violation of the French Constitution and the Nuremberg Code.”

Ey@el

The world of non-lethal weaponry has opened the door to technologies that allow the control of one’s mind, thoughts, actions, and behaviours via the use of pulsed high-frequency microwave blasts, electrical transmissions, and directed heat and sound waves. These can bypass our regular inhibitors and enter the human body and brain unbeknownst to the targeted person until they suffer the consequences.

It’s been going on for decades and not just for war purposes, but to stop protests and riots, silence and incapacitate dissenters, and bring unruly crowds under control.

Read more...

© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Read More

The Technology for Mass Holographic Deception and Psychological Manipulation Has Existed for Decades

In my article about the underlying themes of Muse's song "Exopolitics", I quoted a large excerpt from a book by David Icke, explaining this particular Blue Beam Project that is referred to below and its possible implications in great details. More recently, in another post in reaction to the Friday 13th attacks in Paris, I also quoted Laura Marie's warning about the mind control techniques “going on for ages within the military-industrial complex”, pointing out that they now know “how to implant external thoughts into the mind of soldiers” and, in turn, into everyone's. I know how this may sound so outlandish and hard to consider — probably because the idea is so scary and disturbing to the mind that it'd rather nurture the illusion that some people are just “plain crazy” than accepting that it might be true. Very well, but if you want to remain thoroughly rational, at least make the effort, at first, to examine the evidence available, and if possible, do your own research (thanks to Google's new indexing policy, it'll soon be no longer possible for the average person to do so), then switch off your TV and ask yourself the right questions to know who benefits most from which “pseudo-truth”.

Ey@el

Imagine if governments could project massive, realistic holograms into the sky above entire societies, such as the image of a deity significant to a region. Imagine the implications if such a vision started speaking – the words appearing ‘telepathically’ as thoughts directly inside people’s heads. Disturbingly, this scenario may not be science fiction, as the technology for mass deception and psychological manipulation on a major scale has existed for decades.

Strange sights like giant floating cities have been reported, seen and even filmed by multiple witnesses in different continents. As recently as October 2015, the UK Express reported that floating cities had been seen in China, first over Foshan in the Guangdong province, and a few days later in the province of Jiangxi. A similar “phantom city” was seen over China in 2011. In May, 2015 villagers in Dulali, in Lanzai South Ward, Darazo, Africa Local Government of Bauchi State, Nigeria also witnessed a city floating over their village on multiple occasions, replete with cars and emanating mechanical noises – a sight they attributed to Allah.

Read more...

© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Read More

Here's What the Future of Insect and Nano Drones Looks Like

A prerequisite to the theme of the week: after considering the ultimate scenario with Muse's Drones album, here's the least worst application of the UAV/drone rapidly developing technology yet not the least worrisome. Will there be any fully organic beings left around the globe by the end of the century? I definitely won't be here anymore to witness that (at least not in this actual incarnation) but I have many doubts regarding this issue I would hate to see becoming certainties. I loathe mosquitoes badly enough — what if they can now be used to spy on us — that really won't do it!

Ey@el

Tiny drones are widely expected to become a fixture of American airspace come 2015 as Federal Aviation Administration rules become more relaxed. The FAA believes there will be around 20,000 drones in the sky by 2017, although some say that figure will be much higher.

The drones will come in all shapes and sizes, and they have many different purposes. At the moment, General Atomics' armed surveillance MQ-9 Reaper drone patrols America’s borders looking for illegal immigrants and drug dealers, but many of the drones that are coming, and in some cases are already operating, will be nano drones or insect drones.

Read more...

Original text by translated from French by EY@EL
© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Read More