As I have mentioned a few times, I by no means decide on the topics of my posts. I just let them happen and follow the flow of synchronicities. Sometimes until the very last minute when I don't have any scheduled article in store. I never choose anything and lately, I keep getting signs and perceptions regarding time travel, Mandela effects, and timeline alterations. Including vague recollections beginning to surface. A friend in Florida just released her new book for starseeds about Conscious Time Travel : How to Travel Through Time, Space, and Dimensions. Mind-blowing. And just recently, she shared this tweet explaining that “the Mandela Effect isn't about CERN or manipulation, but is a result of humanity integrating Soul aspects from parallel densities, as prep for the [vibrational] Shift”. It's not your imagination, the tweet says, that Isaiah 11:6 has changed. It really did once read: “The lion shall lie down with the lamb” instead of ”The wolf shall dwell with the lamb”. Enough to drive nuts all the Saint Thomases and masked fundamentalist flat-earthers!
Ey@el
One of the founding fathers of quantum theory, Max Planck, who is often credited with originating quantum theory – a feat that won him the Physics Nobel Prize in 1918 – once stated:
I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as exiting, postulates consciousness.
Fast forward to today and there are a number of experiments in multiple fields showing that Planck was right. Consciousness is fundamental and it is directly intertwined with what we call physical material matter. You cannot explain consciousness in terms of the existing fundamentals like space, time, mass, and charge. As a result, the logical thing to do is postulate whether consciousness itself is something fundamental to the existence of reality, to view consciousness itself as one of these fundamentals, but I digress.
A classic experiment used to examine the role of consciousness and its relationship to matter is the quantum double slit experiment. In this experiment, tiny bits of matter (photons, electrons, or any atomic-sized object) are shot toward a screen that has two slits in it. When there is no measuring device placed at the screen, the tiny bits of matter act as a “wave” and creates an “interference” pattern on the other side where a wall is placed to catch the pattern. Because there was no measuring or observation device used to see what slit the matter went through, we cannot know what path it took. When the pattern on the wall is examined to see what path it took, it represents a wave of possibilities, meaning the matter (particle) went through both slits, and one slit, and interfered with itself, which should be physically impossible. Welcome to the wacky world of quantum physics.
The kicker is, however, when an observation device is set up to observe what slit the particles goes through, the particle then only goes through one, thus collapsing the wave pattern and forming a pattern that is representative of the particle only going through one slit. In other words, the behaviour of the matter changes when we decide to measure it, almost acting as if it was aware that it’s being watched. The pattern on the wall set up behind the slit screen will show this pattern. 50 percent of the time the particle will go through one slit, and the other 50 it will go through the other and form a two slit pattern, just as if they were balls lobbed through one slit or the other.
One of the fundamental principles of physics is that “nothing is lost, everything is transformed”. This is normal since matter is made up of energy and vibration and you only have to change its frequency (motion of particles) to modify its density and form (i.e., the principles of solidification or gasification). I'm aware that, for those who have been following this blog since the early days, this article might read like a brief repeat of those I've already reposted in the past or more recently. However, I think it's an excellent summary of what could be termed as “Quantum Physics For Dummies” (not in a derogatory sense).
Consider your own body being made mostly of space. Close your eyes and experience the space that you’re made of and the space around you vibrating like a crystal. Then imagine that the rate of vibration of your biocrystal structure in the structure of the vacuum is equivalent to the information pouring in and out of you, in the same way that a crystal radio set tuned to a certain frequency allows you to hear a specific radio station. In the body, if the brain is the antennae of the radio set, the tuning dial is the heart, which defines the frequency of information received through the fluid dynamics rhythm of your body, and which can be altered by your emotional state.
Nassim Haramein
Ey@el
All matter on earth consists of atomic material which is in constant motion, vibrating or spinning, manifested in everything within the universe.
All organisms are made out of atoms and molecules, which means literally every living thing is radiating energy and vibration. Every living thing on earth vibrates at its own level with its own sound, determined by the velocity of its frequency.
Motion generates frequencies and in turn, generates sound whether we are able to hear it or not. Everything has a sound, and it’s own level of vibration. The specific sound is determined by the velocity (frequency) of the movement.
All organisms on this planet use vibration i.e., energy, as the primary means of communication. In its original condition vibration is inaudible and invisible, but in its first stage towards manifestation it becomes audible, and its next step is visible.
As there has been much talk about Earth and vibrations on this blog lately — and since I had not posted anything yet about the Schumann resonance, the current significant increase of which seems to play a major role in our human condition, raising awareness and further increasing, on a daily basis, the contrast between those who are awake and the sleepwalkers —, I'd like to share an article for the general public which, as you will see, tends to dismiss such kind of correlations that, despite its claiming otherwise, have been scientifically proven, yet unacknowledged by the institutional minority.
In this regard, those who wish to further their knowledge would be well advised to check the work of Nassim Haramein who is a researcher at the forefront of quantum physics or books by David Wilcock such as The Source Field Investigations.
The Universe is all about energy, all about vibration from the microcosmos to the macrocosmos…
Albert Einstein
The Schumann resonance is actually the vibration of Gaia whose frequency can be viewed as a tuning fork for life. As a matter of fact, some researchers who took over the work of Schumann, such as Dr. Ludwig, found a connection with Tao that would coincide “with the relatively strong YANG signal of the Schumann frequency which surrounds our planet and with the weaker YIN geomagnetic waves from within the Earth. Chinese wisdom considers that in order to achieve optimal health, there should be a balance between both. Humanity is dependent on these subtle signals from environmental energies, which are the Yin from below and the Yang from above.” (Source)
Remember how last week, when replying to my question regarding the symbol on the cover of his album, Ed O'Brien (yes, him again!) explained that the divine feminine I saw in it was also the sign of Earth which has a YIN vibration. I didn't really make the connection until I began writing these lines and I now realise how the triangular shape is a perfect illustration of the energy flow taking source at the tip and spreading upwards.
Ey@el
The Earth has been the focus of a massive amount of scientific studies over the years. From the shrinking ozone layer to the changes in our planet's magnetic field, there's plenty to keep researchers busy.
One possibly surprising area of research is in the way the Earth acts like a giant electrical circuit. The atmosphere of the Earth is actually a weak conductor. If there was no source of electric charge for the atmosphere, its energy would dissipate in about 10 minutes – but it doesn't.
The ionosphere is the region of the Earth's atmosphere that starts at around 50-100km above the surface and reaches upward for several hundreds of kilometers.
Due to solar radiation, individual electrons are dislodged from otherwise neutral gas atoms in this region, creating positively charged ions. This makes the ionosphere conductive and able to trap electromagnetic waves.
Between the Earth's surface and the ionosphere is a cavity containing a total electrical charge of 500K Coulombs. There is a vertical current flow between the ground and the ionosphere. The atmosphere has a resistance of 200 Ohms and a voltage potential of 200,000 Volts.
Around the Earth, there are roughly two thousand lightning storms at any given period of time, producing around 50 flashes of lightning every second. This accounts for much of the measured flow in this electromagnetic cavity.
Following an article on time travels I wrote last month in French for a community project called Eklabugs, I came across this long piece in Michael Crichton's Timeline novel — also adapted on screen, but haven't seen it — in which a scientist explains the basic principles of quantum physics to a bunch of students in a comprehensive but simple way. I thought it would be a good idea to share it here. For those who'd like to read more, the story takes place in Dordogne, south-western France, in a mediaeval excavation site where a group of American archaeologists is sent via a quantum computer back to the Middle Ages in the midst of the One Hundred Year's War to rescue a professor stuck there...
Ey@el
A hundred years ago," Gordon said, "physicists understood that energy — like light or magnetism or electricity — took the form of continuously flowing waves. We still refer to `radio waves' and `light waves.' In fact, the recognition that all forms of energy shared this wavelike nature was one of the great achievements of nineteenth-century physics. "But there was a small problem," he said. It turned out that if you shined light on a metal plate, you got an electric current. The physicist Max Planck studied the relationship between the amount of light shining on the plate and the amount of electricity produced, and he concluded that energy wasn't a continuous wave. Instead, energy seemed to be composed of individual units, which he called quanta. "The discovery that energy came in quanta was the start of quantum physics," Gordon said. "A few years later, Einstein showed that you could explain the photoelectric effect by assuming that light was composed of particles, which he called photons. These photons of light struck the metal plate and knocked off electrons, producing electricity. Mathematically, the equations worked. They fit the view that light consisted of particles. Okay so far?" "Yes..." "And pretty soon, physicists began to realize that not only light, but all energy was composed of particles. In fact, all matter in the universe took the form of particles. Atoms were composed of heavy particles in the nucleus, light electrons buzzing around on the outside. So, according to the new thinking, everything is particles. Okay?" "Okay..." "The particles are discrete units, or quanta. And the theory that describes how these particles behave is quantum theory. A major discovery of twentieth-century physics." They were all nodding. "Physicists continue to study these particles, and begin to realize they're very strange entities. You can't be sure where they are, you can't measure them exactly, and you can't predict what they will do. Sometimes they behave like particles, sometimes like waves. Sometimes two particles will interact with each other even though they're a million miles apart, with no connection between them. And so on. The theory is starting to seem extremely weird. "Now, two things happen to quantum theory. The first is that it gets confirmed, over and over. It's the most proven theory in the history of science. Supermarket scanners, lasers and computer chips all rely on quantum mechanics. So there is absolutely no doubt that quantum theory is the correct mathematical description of the universe. "But the problem is, it's only a mathematical description. It's just a set of equations. And physicists couldn't visualize the world that was implied by those equations - it was too weird, too contradictory. Einstein, for one, didn't like that. He felt it meant the theory was flawed. But the theory kept getting confirmed, and the situation got worse and worse. Eventually, even scientists who won the Nobel Prize for contributions to quantum theory had to admit they didn't understand it. "So, this made a very odd situation. For most of the twentieth century, there's a theory of the universe that everyone uses, and everyone agrees is correct — but nobody can tell you what it is saying about the world." "What does all this have to do with multiple universes?" Marek said. "I'm getting there," Gordon said. Many physicists tried to explain the equations, Gordon said. Each explanation failed for one reason or another. Then in 1957, a physicist named Hugh Everett proposed a daring new explanation. Everett claimed that our universe — the universe we see, the universe of rocks and trees and people and galaxies out in space - was just one of an infinite number of universes, existing side by side. Each of these universes was constantly splitting, so there was a universe where Hitler lost the war, and another where he won; a universe where Kennedy died, and another where he lived. And also a world where you brushed your teeth in the morning, and one where you didn't. And so forth, on and on and on. An infinity of worlds. Everett called this the "many worlds" interpretation of quantum mechanics. His explanation was consistent with the quantum equations, but physicists found it very hard to accept. They didn't like the idea of all these worlds constantly splitting all the time. They found it unbelievable that reality could take this form. "Most physicists still refuse to accept it," Gordon said. "Even though no one has ever shown it is wrong." Everett himself had no patience with his colleagues' objections. He insisted the theory was true, whether you liked it or not. If you disbelieved his theory, you were just being stodgy and old-fashioned, exactly like the scientists who disbelieved the Copernican theory that placed the sun at the center of the solar system — and which had also seemed unbelievable at the time. "Because Everett claimed the many worlds concept was actually true. There really were multiple universes. And they were running right alongside our own. All these multiple universes were eventually referred to as a `multiverse.' " "Wait a minute," Chris said. "Are you telling us this is true?" "Yes," Gordon said. "It's true." "How do you know?" Marek said. "I'll show you," Gordon said. And he reached for a manila file that said "ITC/CTC Technology." He took out a blank piece of paper, and began drawing. "Very simple experiment, it's been done for two hundred years. Set up two walls, one in front of the other. The first wall has a single vertical slit in it." He showed them the drawing.
● ●
"Now you shine a light at the slit. On the wall behind, you'll see..." "A white line," Marek said. "From the light coming through the slit." "Correct. It would look something like this." Gordon pulled out a photo on a card.
Gordon continued to sketch. "Now, instead of one slit, you have a wall with two vertical slits in it. Shine a light on it, and on the wall behind, you see..."
"Two vertical lines," Marek said. "No. You'll see a series of light and dark bars." He showed them:
And," Gordon continued, "if you shine your light through four slits, you get half as many bars as before. Because every other bar goes black.">
Marek frowned. "More slits mean fewer bars? Why?" "The usual explanation is what I've drawn - the light passing through the slits acts like two waves that overlap. In some places they add to each other, and in other places they cancel each other out. And that makes a pattern of alternating light and dark on the wall. We say the waves interfere with each other, and that this is an interference pattern." Chris Hughes said, "So? What's wrong with all that?" "What's wrong," Gordon said, "is that I just gave you a nineteenth-century explanation. It was perfectly acceptable when everybody believed that light was a wave. But since Einstein, we know that light consists of particles called photons. How do you explain a bunch of photons making this pattern?" There was silence. They were shaking their heads. David Stern spoke for the first time. "Particles aren't as simple as the way you have described them. Particles have some wavelike properties, depending on the situation. Particles can interfere with one another. In this case, the photons in the beam of light are interfering with one another to produce the same pattern." "That does seem logical," Gordon said. "After all, a beam of light is zillions and zillions of little photons. It's not hard to imagine that they would interact with one another in some fashion, and produce the interference pattern." They were all nodding. Yes, not hard to imagine. "But is it really true?" Gordon said. "Is that what's going on? One way to find out is to eliminate any interaction among the photons. Let's just deal with one photon at a time. This has been done experimentally. You make a beam of light so weak that only one photon comes out at a time. And you can put very sensitive detectors behind the slits — so sensitive, they can register a single photon hitting them. Okay?" They nodded, more slowly this time. "Now, there can't be any interference from other photons, because we are dealing with a single photon only. So: the photons come through, one at a time. The detectors record where the photons land. And after a few hours, we get a result, something like this.
"What we see," Gordon said, "is that the individual photons land only in certain places, and never others. They behave exactly the same as they do in a regular beam of light. But they are coming in one at a time. There are no other photons to interfere with them. Yet something is interfering with them, because they are making the usual interference pattern. So: What is interfering with a single photon?" Silence. "Mr. Stern?" Stern shook his head. "If you calculate the probabilities-" "Let's not escape into mathematics. Let's stay with reality. After all, this experiment has been performed - with real photons, striking real detectors. And something real interferes with them. The question is, What is it?" "It has to be other photons," Stern said. "Yes," Gordon said, "but where are they? We have detectors, and we don't detect any other photons. So where are the interfering photons?" Stern sighed. "Okay," he said. He threw up his hands. Chris said, "What do you mean, Okay? Okay what?" Gordon nodded to Stern. "Tell them." "What he is saying is that single-photon interference proves that reality is much greater than just what we see in our universe. The interference is happening, but we can't see any cause for it in our universe. Therefore, the interfering photons must be in other universes. And that proves that the other universes exist." "Correct," Gordon said. "And they sometimes interact with our own universe." "I'm sorry," Marek said. "Would you do that again? Why is some other universe interfering with our universe?" "It's the nature of the multiverse," Gordon said. "Remember, within the multiverse, the universes are constantly splitting, which means that many other universes are very similar to ours. And it is the similar ones that interact. Each time we make a beam of light in our universe, beams of light are simultaneously made in many similar universes, and the photons from those other universes interfere with the photons in our universe and produce the pattern that we see." "And you are telling us this is true?" "Absolutely true. The experiment has been done many times." Marek frowned. Kate stared at the table. Chris scratched his head. Finally David Stern said, "Not all the universes are similar to ours?" "No." "Are they all simultaneous to ours?" "Not all, no." "Therefore some universes exist at an earlier time?" "Yes. Actually, since they are infinite in number, the universes exist at all earlier times."
Every year as you know it, my neighbours and I are treated to a firework display right on our doorstep. Which may sound wonderful to some of you is actually more a curse than a blessing. Since I've already detailed the reasons why on top of the obvious waste of public money at the expense of the actual needs of citizens, please refer to my previous post.
This year, I've decided to stop playing the Matrix's undermining game and raise my vibrations instead by seeing the glass half-full rather than half-empty, focusing exclusively on the bright side of the matter. Which didn't prevent me from remaining fully aware and taking adequate precautions such as wearing a protective mask and glasses against toxic fumes and dust as well as some repellent against the winged vampires from the nearby pond (for whom this type of event is a feast from heaven). And I must say the pyrotechnicians have done a brilliant job this time. I feel so frustrated that my video display is far from rendering the beauty of what my always marvelling eyes saw last night.
As for my ears, it's another story with the never-ending tributes to our national Elvis who died last year and will probably never cease to haunt us from hereafter to the great despair of all the nonplussed such as yours truly. Wouldn't want to offend anyone who might like him, so I won't call him by name. So if you think you know who I'm talking about, just remember that there is only one slip of the tongue to take you from casually to casualty. Always resourceful, I simply called upon Muse to offer you an ad hoc soundtrack while the whole video is being hosted by Radiohead's WASTE network. Thank you guys!
Entropy: a measure of the unavailable energy in a closed thermodynamic system that is also usually considered to be a measure of the system's disorder, that is a property of the system's state, and that varies directly with any reversible change in heat in the system and inversely with the temperature of the system; broadly: the degree of disorder or uncertainty in a system (source)
Now if you ever wondered why all the efforts to make us physically sick, to stress us, to keep us in fear, division, competition, distraction, to dishearten and decentralise us, to fuel our egos, desacralise love and hack the sexual function, patent nature and the human body, saturate the ionosphere with electromagnetic waves set on the same frequency range as the human brain (as if there wasn't any other range available) as well as to tamper with climate data to justify climate intervention to block solar rays — well, I guess this article should provide all the answers which could be summed up into a single one: to impede our awareness and our power to change the world from within us.
The reasons why it's so difficult to achieve have just been mentioned (though incomprehensively). So if it doesn't incite you to change, at least do spare us all your complaining about fools for you're one of them and your focusing only serves to feed the bullshit. Oops! If that's all it takes to make you more conscious (and less compelled, compliant, and complacent), then I take full responsibility for the indignity, particularly when I admit behaving like a fool at times wherever I forget to be in the present moment, allowing borrowed emotions to overwhelm and even possess me. I'm no longer ashamed of that though, since I realise that feeling is not mine either. Even so, I do not deem myself brave (ego judgement). Just like you, I'm just doing the best I can, learning by the day how to reach the next level to eventually meet my optimal threshhold.
Regarding solar and geomagnetic activity both mentioned in the article below, “we are actually in the midst of an episode of geomagnetic storms along with strong solar winds penetrating into the electromagnetic field of the Earth and affecting all living things on the planet.” (Source)
We have reached numerous peaks within the Schumann Resonance [...] And all this at the same time as a Full Blue Moon. If you are experiencing great surges of energy or fatigue, you now know the reason why. Most of all, let's stay in the course of positive energies and everything will be fine […] Gaia is shifting its vibration frequency and so are we. These are one of the many signs that we are AWAKENING [...] All this is meant to bring us into harmony with the NEW EARTH. (Source)
“One day in our lives, we'll get enlightened” would sing Indochine. Reckon they should have said “we'll shine our light”, for no one will come and plug us in. Especially not the electric company with all their dumbing meters, let alone Santa Claus.
Ey@el
Science has recently shed light on the fact that what we used to perceive as ‘human’ aura is actually real. All of our bodies emit an electromagnetic field, and this fact plays a very important role far beyond what is commonly known when it comes to understanding our biology, and the interconnectedness we share with all life.
For example, did you know that the heart emits the largest electromagnetic field of all the body’s major organs? These fields and the information encoded into them can change based on how we are feeling, what we thinking, and different emotions we take on. The heart even sends signals to the brain through a system of neurons that have both short-term and long-term memory, and these signals can affect our emotional experiences. The emotional information that’s modulated and coded into these fields changes their nature, and these fields can impact those around us. As Rollin McCraty, Ph.D, and director of research at The HeartMath institute tell us, “we are fundamentally and deeply connected with each other and the planet itself.”
Since I'm an evil person hired by the CIA and the little big-headed green dudes from planet Cetelem, I've decided to give you a helluva migraine and mess up with your ego with the mind-blowing article below. Seriously, it was such a pain in the mind to translate into French but it turned into some kind of ectasy when I finally managed to shut up my mind to embrace the whole thing from a different level of awareness and... wow! I know, it all sounds very abstract, but we're bound to go in circles when trying to explain something our mind hasn't been programmed to understand, besides with our ego being upset by such a complete upheaval in its reference points and will be prompt to censor and disagree with. Please, do not consider my words as some kind of demonstration of “superiority” (judgment = ego), but rather as a lame and hazardous attempt to trigger some awareness in those open to receive it. If you don't, it won't be because you're stupid or insufficiently educated (do I have a PhD in astrophysics?) but simply because you're not ready yet. It will come in due time. Let's stop testing our smarts against each others.
In my own experience, the whole idea of time-travelling has always triggered some rejection in me, referring to scifi movies too far-fetched in my opinion, which somehow had a reassuring effect in that it provides a false sense of relief as if there was no way such things could ever happen in our reality. However, as far as I can remember, but with strong mental repression (it's funny how easy event memory can fade completely whereas what I would call “quantum memory” — for lack of proper word — persists even through collective amnesia), I have always “known”. Except, you see people who “know” not only upset other people's egos but are considered a threat to the status quo. So you convince everyone that whatever deviates from the norm is to be regarded is madness and sometimes you even manage to convince those who think otherwise that they are actually crazy by harassing, medicating or lobotomising them. When it fails to work because they're growing in numbers and consistence, providing admissible evidence (let's reflect on what or who makes evidence admissible), you point them as evil manipulators, conspiracy theorists, fake-newsers, pseudo-scientifics, quacks... Propaganda propaganda. Never mind, it's time to make up your minds and whether or not you're being misled, either way you will have to bear the consequences of your choice. And should you choose not to choose, to remain “neutral”, it's still a choice known as denial. Denial is refusing to use your power of discernment.
In this sense, the article below as you should perceive if you cannot fully grasp it with your mind, offers exciting prospects in regard to our creative power hence our responsibility. We have the ability to change our timelines. Incidentally, a couple of months ago I came across an article explaining how changes in our timelines resulted sometimes in deep-seated memories being invalidated by new encoded timelines. Unfortunately I lost the link which is a piy as it provided a good complement to the one below while being equally upsetting to our poor minds.
In the meantime, don't pressure yourself too much, try read through this piece and it should eventually sink in somehow. At the right time, you'll have some kind of epiphay and think “yes, of course, that is... wow!”
Ey@el
Physicist and Nobel laureate Richard Feynman once said, “We choose to examine a phenomenon which is impossible, absolutely impossible, to explain in any classical way, and which has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery.”
And it’s true. Multiple theories, such as quantum entanglement, have exited the theoretical realm and been confirmed within the mainstream. Even browsing through some previously classified documents in the CIA’s electronic reading room, you can see how Black Budget science confirmed some of these topics decades ago, yet we never heard about it through the mainstream. Here is a prime example of a document on quantum entanglement. From this document we can see that its existence was confirmed decades ago.
What’s also interesting about that document is that it discusses telepathy, a phenomenon directly related to and made possible by discoveries within quantum physics. “Parapsychology” pr “Psi” and quantum physics go hand in hand.
Now, a recent paper, published in Proceedings of The Royal Society A, supports the argument that quantum theory must be “retrocausal,”or that an effect can occur before its cause.
In the Wachowskis' (the directors of Matrix and V for Vendetta) Jupiter Ascending, a movie character explains to the protagonist how the most precious resource in the universe is time. Indeed, how endless it feels when experiencing tiresome situations and how it flies when enjoying chosen activities. That alone should be sufficient proof of how the concept of time itself is not only subjective but quite relative. Time is not linear because there are infinite numbers of intertwining timelines good old Dr Who loved surfing so much in his TARDIS (Time and Relative Dimension in Space) spacecraft resembling a British police telephone box. The following article chiefly provides food for thoughts and a reminder, even though, in some respects (you'll have to figure out for yourself), it may be difficult to grasp insomuch as it takes purely theoretical statements for recognised facts I will neither validate nor invalidate — still having both an open mind and reservations about the issue.
Ey@el
What are timelines and why do some predicted events come and go without the anticipated event ever happening?
What is a Timeline?
A timeline is a chronological point within time and space that is relevant to this planet. For example, a list of inventions in chronological order since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution could be shown on a timeline.
Time is linear and is only relevant to this planet. A day on Earth is calculated by the amount of time it takes for our planet to fully rotate on its axis. A day on Mars is similar, but different because it takes Mars approximately 28 hours to revolve on its axis as it revolves around the sun, proving that time (as we know it) is only relevant to this planet. When we cross over to the other side, time, as we know it, no longer exists.
This is the article from Collective Evolution shared on his Facebook page by the late Prince in response to some questions asked by fans as mentioned previously in last week's repost. Regular readers might recall the compelling topics that cymatics and the influence of music on our bodies and minds are. I must confess that, besides musician Nigel Stanford's experiments, the samples presented here really impressed the hell out of me! Since my ears cannot pick all high frequencies, I thought I wouldn't be able to hear any of the subtleties between A=432 Hz and A=440 Hz (which is the case with MP3 files where I can't tell the difference between a 128 and a 320kbps encoding), but not only do I hear it, I also feel it strongly within my inner core and that, from the very first notes. Try it for yourself and see how fascinating it is. Now, converting all your music to A=432 Hz might be set to be a tedious task though, considering that — according to the video tutorial link provided at the end of the article — the tuning of the original source must first be identified and next, in order to change pitch without losing quality, a commercial application takes about 10 minutes per track (whereas it's much quicker using Audacity, which is freeware, there is a loss in quality).
Ey@el
If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.
Nikola Tesla
What we have called matter is energy, whose vibration has been so lowered as to be perceptible to the senses. There is no matter.
Albert Einstein
Tesla said it. Einstein agreed. Science proved it. It is a known fact that everything—including our own bodies—is made up of energy vibrating at different frequencies. That being said, it seems logical to wonder, can sound frequencies affect us? It would appear that this is the case. Frequencies affect frequencies, much like mixing ingredients with other ingredients affects the overall flavour of a meal. The way frequencies affect the physical world has been demonstrated through various experiments, such as the science of Cymatics and water memory.
FR
